Accessibility settings

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Research Methodology - AI (54) Recommendation (5) Research Instruments, Questionnaires, and Tools (798) Knowledge Translation and Implementation Science (594) Digital Health Reporting Standards, Quality and Transparency in e-Research (157) Artificial Intelligence (2416) Digital Health Meta-Research and Bibliographic Studies (76) Transparent Reporting (17)

Published on in Vol 4 (2025)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/80247, first published .
Transparent Reporting of AI in Systematic Literature Reviews: Development of the PRISMA-trAIce Checklist

Transparent Reporting of AI in Systematic Literature Reviews: Development of the PRISMA-trAIce Checklist

Transparent Reporting of AI in Systematic Literature Reviews: Development of the PRISMA-trAIce Checklist

Authors of this article:

Dirk Holst1 Author Orcid Image ;   Keno Moenck1 Author Orcid Image ;   Julian Koch1 Author Orcid Image ;   Ole Schmedemann1 Author Orcid Image ;   Thorsten Schüppstuhl1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (3) Tweetations (34) Metrics

Journals

  1. Jay M, Morgan M, Straus S, WIlson E, Sutradhar R, Yu C, Gotlib Conn L, Dharma C, Lipscombe L, Eskander A. Evaluating the Methodological Quality of Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Systematic Reviews: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Meta-Research Study (Preprint). JMIR Research Protocols 2025 View
  2. Leon C, Kudelka M. Auditing GenAI Literature Search Workflows: A Replicable Protocol for Traceable, Accountable Retrieval in Student-Facing Inquiry. AI in Education 2026;2(2):8 View
  3. Liebrand B, Braunhofer L, van der Weegen W, Vissers K, Van Goethem J, Van Zundert J, van den Boogaart M, van der Wal S. Accuracy in spinal level determination, including transitional vertebrae: an ASReview supported systematic review. European Spine Journal 2026 View